Forage legume descriptors

1984

The Forage Legume Descriptors list was developed by a subcommittee, from the Commission of the European Communities' (CEC) Programme Committee for Plant Disease Resistance Breeding and the use of Genebanks. The final list combines experience from National List Descriptors, UPOV Descriptor Lists and was produced with advice and according to the standard format of the International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR).

The sub—committee under the chairmanship of Dr.S. Andersen carried out its deliberations, mainly by correspondence‘over the period 1979—83.

Crop
foragelegume
Publisher
IPGRI
Bibliographic citation

International Plant Genetic Resources Instit., (IPGRI): Commission of European Communities (CEC). (1984). Forage legume descriptors. Rome: Bioversity.

Version
1984

1 = very short to 9= very long

Classification
Characterization
Data type
Scale
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Legend:

1

Very short

3

Short

5

Medium

7

Long

9

Very long

1 = very narrow, to 9 = very broad

Classification
Characterization
Data type
Scale
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Legend:

1

Very narrow

3

Narrow

5

Medium

7

Broad

9

Very broad

Classification
Characterization
Data type
Scale
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Legend:

3

Elongated

5

Ovate

7

Round

Percentage of plant showing V-leaf marks

Classification
Characterization
Data type
Free text

1= very short to 9= very long

Classification
Characterization
Data type
Scale
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Legend:

3

Short

5

Medium

7

Long

1= very thin to 9= very thick

Classification
Characterization
Data type
Scale
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Legend:

3

Thin

5

Medium

7

Thick

Percentage positive plants to HCN picrate paper test. It is recommended to test 60 individual plants

Classification
Characterization
Data type
Numeric
Unit of measure
%

Expressed as a mean angle of the shoots from vertical scale: 1= very erect, to 9= very prostorate

Classification
Characterization
Data type
Free text

1 = very short to 9= very long

Classification
Characterization
Data type
Numeric
Classification
Characterization
Data type
Scale
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Legend:

3

Thin

5

Medium

7

Thick

Classification
Characterization
Data type
Scale
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Legend:

1

Very short

3

Short

5

Medium

7

Long

9

Very long

To be assessed on plants not exposed to short day and/or low temperature vernalisation

Classification
Characterization
Data type
Scale
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Legend:

1

Very low

3

Low

5

Medium

7

High

9

Very high

Date when 50% of plants first show petal colour development on an inflorescence

Classification
Characterization
Data type
Scale
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Legend:

1

Very early

3

Early

5

Medium

7

Late

9

Very late

Classification
Characterization
Data type
Scale
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Legend:

3

Light red

7

Dark red

Classification
Characterization
Data type
Coded
CodeTermDescription
1White
2Yellow
3Light blue-violet
4Dark blue-violet
5Red-violet

Percentage of plants with variegated flowers

Classification
Characterization
Data type
Free text
Classification
Characterization
Data type
Coded
CodeTermDescription
1Yellow
2Bi-color
3Violet

Percent of plant damaged - adgusted to control

Classification
Characterization
Data type
Scale
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Legend:

1

Very little or no damage

9

Very much damage = plant dead

Spring yield ye scores 4 weeks after the end of the winter

Classification
Characterization
Data type
Coded
CodeTermDescription
4.4.2.1Control variety name
4.4.2.2Estimated yield relative to adjusted designated control
4.4.2.3Summer yield -eye score at the flowering time. Yield relative to adjusted designated control
4.4.2.4Autumn yield - eye score

Scored at full bloom (from 1 (sparse) to 9 (very profuse) scale )

Classification
Characterization
Data type
Free text